On March 6, Crimea’s regional parliament voted for the peninsula to join Russia. Russian President Vladimir Putin told German Chancellor Angela Merkel and British Prime Minister David Cameron that in doing so, the Crimean authorities were acting on the basis of international law. Their aim was to protect the “legitimate interests of the population of Crimea,” Putin added.
The Crimean parliament also announced that it would hold a referendum on its decision on March 16. Both Merkel and Cameron warned Putin against holding such a vote. The outcome is a foregone conclusion. EU and U.S. leaders seem powerless to stop it. They keep calling on Russia not to escalate the crisis and to negotiate with the interim government in Kiev.
So far, Moscow has ignored all such requests. And Russia has snubbed Germany’s diplomatic efforts. In recent weeks, German Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier has gone out of his way to give diplomacy a chance, yet Russia seems uninterested. And the longer EU and U.S. diplomats try to pursue the path of mediation, the more Putin can play for time. That means consolidating his grip over Crimea.
Besides its growing military presence, Russia is gaining control in other ways, too. The Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, of which Russia is a member, has been prevented from sending observers into Crimea. Its unarmed monitors have been forced back several times. At one stage, shots were fired at them.
The OSCE’s representative for freedom of the media issued a grim report on March 8. Dunja Mijatović said that several television channels have had their signals cut and have been replaced by Russian state television. The Internet connection of the Crimean Tatar channel ATR is down. Unidentified assailants have attacked journalists and confiscated their equipment, Mijatović added.
If the Crimean authorities are so confident of popular support for joining Russia, why are they afraid of allowing OSCE monitors, journalists, and nongovernmental organizations access to the region?
What is happening now in Crimea mirrors developments in Russia. Putin’s rule is becoming ever more repressive and paranoid about diverging opinions, possibly reflecting the mentality of his KGB background. Those trends speeded up after Putin was elected president for the second time in 2012, and have accelerated further over recent weeks.
In Moscow, independent-minded television presenters and reporters have been sacked because they dared to criticize Putin’s takeover of Crimea or report in an unbiased way about the interim government in Kiev.
The Kremlin has reinforced its crackdown on nongovernmental organizations and independent public opinion polling institutes. Members of the Pussy Riot band were recently attacked in a restaurant in Moscow. Russian opposition leader Alexei Navalny has been put behind bars, and not for the first time. It seems that any opinions that do not reflect the Kremlin’s view on Ukraine are being muzzled.
The EU and the United States can still act. Waiting for diplomacy to work merely plays into Putin’s hands. He has already started unilaterally changing Europe’s borders. He has set a dangerous precedent in Crimea, and he could be tempted to go further. Poland, the Baltic states, and Sweden understand what is unfolding in Europe: the continent’s post–Cold War order and values are now vulnerable.
Steps by the EU to boycott this year’s G8 summit in Sochi or suspend talks on visa-free travel are, at best, symbolic measures. They will not alter the facts on the ground. What would make a difference is a freeze on assets held by Russian banks and oligarchs throughout Europe and the United States. The EU should seriously consider such sanctions. If European leaders do not act soon, more than Crimea will be lost. The EU’s soft tools will be deemed useless.
By Guylain Gustave Moke
Photo-Credit: AFP- Vladimir Putin & Barack Obama photo